JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)April 20, 2016

A- de 2016

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Ernesto Vargas Silva

✓Claimant Daniel Saenz Roncancio

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Solicitud de aclaración de la sentencia T-774/15.

El Director de División de Fondos Especiales y Cobro Coactivo de la Dirección Ejecutiva de Administración Judicial pretende que la Corporación aclare la providencia de la referencia, en el sentido de indicar si se continúa con la ejecución de los procesos de cobro coactivo por multas impuestas por incidente de desacato o se terminan por orden judicial.

Luego de verificar que la petición fue formulada de manera extemporánea, la Sala Plena decide RECHAZARLA.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RESUELVE
  2. UNICO.- RECHAZAR la solicitud de aclaracion de la Sentencia T-774 de 2015 presentada mediante escrito del 29 de marzo de 2016 por el Director de la Division de Fondos Especiales y Cobro Coactivo de la Direccion Ejecutiva de Administracion Judicial, por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.